* Joerg Schilling ([email protected]) wrote: > Glenn Lagasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The bits from Indiana which may become Solaris.Next did not go through > > > ARC either ;-) > > > > *yet*. > > > > They *will* go through the ARC process before they are shipped in > > Solaris.Next. > > Given the fact that there are _many_ changes to be discussed, this will take > a > long time.
Well, I don't know how long it will take. I just know that it's going to happen and sooner rather than later. > I am interested in the discussion for the security problems introduced by the > way pfexec is currently used on Indiana ;-) And you're waiting for the ARC review to do that? I haven't looked too closely but I'm not generally aware of any security problems introduced by pfexec in OpenSolaris. I'd suggest filing a high priority bug (if there isn't one already) and starting the discussion sooner rather than later (again, if it hasn't been done). Waiting for ARC review seems the wrong time to bring something like that up if you know about a potential issue ahead of time. Cheers, -- Glenn _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
