Edward Martinez wrote:
> I do consider 134 as an RC because it was said last year that next stable
> release would be 2010.02 and be based from b 134 but how would that be
> possible, if build 134 was released on march 8?
It wouldn't be, which is why that was never said.
When the plan was originally made for 2010.02, it was going to use build 132.
When the plan shifted last fall to 2010.03, it also shifted to build 134.
(Contrary to mistaken belief by many people, 2010.02 didn't slip at the last
minute - the plans changed months in advance to better align with other
schedules.)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
