occured und In-Reply-To: <16918.1201113917 at athyra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OpenSolaris-URL: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=196097&tstart=0#196097
Mike wrote: > "JK" =3D=3D J=C3=BCrgen Keil <jk at tools.de> writes: >=20 > JK> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007111601/ >=20 > >> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/known_issues/ > >> says build 46 is enough to build. Is this information outdated? >=20 > JK> I'd say that information is outdated. You need a newer nevada build > JK> than snv_46 to compile current on gate bits. > =20 > ops. I'll update the known issues page. Thanks for > finding the flag day mail from Adam. There are other files that mention Nevada build 46 is required for building current opensolaris sources: The "OpenSolaris README (Release Notes)" file from the=20 20080114 download: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/ http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/README.opensolaris And from onnv b80 sources: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b80/ http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b80/README.opensolaris =20 =20 This message posted from opensolaris.org
