* Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> [2008-03-13 23:12]:
> (redirecting to website-discuss)
> 
> >>>>> "Guido" == Guido Ostkamp <Guido.Ostkamp at nsn.com> writes:
> 
> Guido> I noticed that access to the OpenSolaris Mercurial repository is
> Guido> only possible through ssh. Is there any reason for this when the
> Guido> Source is already OpenSource?
> 
> Well, I know of at least one implementation issue.  Currently the same
> host serves both the web site and the source repositories.  I'm not a
> web services expert, so I don't know how hard it would be to redirect
> HTTP requests for Mercurial to the right place.
 
  We could spin up another system to handle that.  What I believe is
  more complicated is that we use the same systems to handle multiple
  repositories under each of Subversion and Mercurial, with a single
  access mechanism.  Mixing these into a coherent HTTP-accessible form
  is a project.

> The SCM implementation spec at
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/scmhostspec/ does
> mention allowing HTTP URLs.  Maybe we just haven't gotten to
> implementing that yet?

  No, that's implemented.  The actual URL is

  http://opensolaris.org/sc/src/project/repo/foo.c

> Guido> It would be really great if access could be made possible through
> Guido> simple HTTP.
> 
> Guido> Or at least if complete Mercurial bundle's would be offered for
> Guido> HTTP download where I could download a base revision including
> Guido> all history and then regular update bundles to get the rest of
> Guido> it.
> 
> We could certainly take that as a feature request.
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org, category=solaris/opensolaris.

  Maybe.  I've not yet heard a compelling case on why anonymous SSH
  access isn't sufficient.

  - Stephen

-- 
sch at sun.com  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/

Reply via email to