At any given point in time, one viewer is more stable than another, and at another point in time, it's the other way around. This is perfectly normal, and blanket statements about superior stability make no sense ... especially when they share common code! :-)
If anything, Snowglobe could well be more stable over time, since any bugs probably won't last long because they tend to get patched rapidly and a new tagged version released. In contrast the official LL viewer gets released infrequently. One shouldn't read too much into PR or advocacy statements anyway. Morgaine. ================================= On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Thomas Grimshaw <t...@streamsense.net>wrote: > It's the truth. Snowglobe is unstable. > > ~Tom > > Armin Weatherwax wrote: > >> I am simply pointing out that they are NOT compatible with the GPL. > >> > > GPL compatible or not - the sentence "The Snowglobe Viewer [...] this > > viewer may be somewhat less stable than the official Second Life > > viewer"( http://viewerdirectory.secondlife.com/ at 2010/03/10 00:06 > > GMT+1) is a slap into the face of anybody contributing bugfixes to the > > secondlife codebase. > > > > Armin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
