On 2010-03-21, at 12:24, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote: > * Similarly, any comment by one of Linden's lawyers in this forum or > any other could possibly be treated as legally binding. That also > goes for Linden employees, especially those with any seniority. So > you're unlikely to get further remarks or "clarifications", except > general statements that don't address specific questions. The policy > was revised based on comments on this list and elsewhere. That's > probably a pretty good indication that Linden Lab's lawyers now > think it's clear enough to state its intent and to stand up in court > if they need it to.
That's fine, from Linden Labs side, but there are developers who WANT a legally binding change before they'll accept the agreement. For example, whether LL can publicly release personally identifiable information about a developer without giving that developer the option of withdrawing their viewer from the TPV page instead. At the moment, LL is reserving the option of changing the information listed in the TPV page at will. Why would that be so hard a concession to make? _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
