*confused* I thought that we were going to use hg, so that commits made internally can be easilly and frequently pushed to a public repository. Is that "viewer-public"?
Then why is there is there still a "viewer-external" using SVN? That kinda defeats the purpose of hg? I thought, and think, that snowglobe development should also be done with hg, so we can have all the benefits of having local repositories and experimental branches to developer and test patches. On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) <q...@lindenlab.com>wrote: > Hi, all. I've created a draft of our repository strategy for how we will be > handling open development branches at LL, and posted an annotated diagram on > the wiki. > > https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Repository_Strategy > > Questions and constructive commentary are encouraged. Since it's policy we > intend to follow, please edit only for clarity. If it needs substantive > tweaking, please let us do it. > > Thanks, > > Q > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
