Hi Q
thanks for illustrating the planned process.
On 03/22/2010 04:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote:
> Since it's policy we intend to follow, please edit only for clarity. If it
> needs substantive tweaking, please let us do it.
>
As not everyone who might find that wiki article will be reading this
mailing list, you might want to enable stable versioning on it. That
will still allow everyone to easily edit the "draft" version while you
can review changes before you "verify" them and they go live as the
"stable page". The Documentation Team uses that for the KB part of the
wiki, so Torley etc. can probably tell you how to do it.
> Questions and constructive commentary are encouraged.
>
* about *K)*-*N)*: In cases where none of planned new features
require secrecy, can viewer-release be exported to a corresponding
external branch, too?
* about *M)*: Also in cases where none of planned new features
require secrecy, can private beta be skipped in favor of an
earlier public beta?
* about *O)*: What about the inverse, can the community opt not to
merge certain features from upstream (viewer-external) into Snowglobe?
cheers
Boroondas
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
