Henri Beauchamp wrote: > SL is the ONLY so-called (but actually still not, obviously: a Canada-Dry > LGPL, perhaps ?) LGPL Open Source project requiring a License agreement > from its contributors !!! This makes strictly no sense and is a clear > impairement. > > I'd also be curious to know any other of your "good and valid reasons"...
I, obviously, am not in a position to speak for Linden Lab, but let me offer my opinion. This project is somewhat different from most LGPL projects in that if there is no CA, it places Linden in the position of being sued for copyright infringement if someone contributes plagiarized code. Most LGPL projects don't have a corporate owner with money worth suing for. Mike _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
