On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) <q...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > If the reason is that we can't use the issue the way it's written, then > please don't reopen it, write a new and better one.
Just make sure on the Linden side we have a few things laid out 1 if a linden closes a jira then there should be a comment with a "long form" reason as to why it has been closed then close it 2 if a jira needs an edit/rewrite to be useful then leave a comment as to why and how (this is a meta issue , this needs to be split into N jiras for tracking , fix requires breaking laws of Government/Physics, duplicate of older jira, fix involves code we are dropping altogether ect) 3 "WorkingOnIt Linden"* should only have an issue assigned for maybe two weeks since a lot of times WorkingOnIt Linden means BlowingItOff Linden is actually NOT working on it. -- Robert L Martin *prove me wrong but if you look in the logs i would almost bet money that WOI Linden assigned jiras are mostly closed by 1 target version became outdated 2 no linden actually picked it up 3 some linden closed it with WONT FIX/ CAN'T FIX or anything that boils down to it not actually being fixed _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
