Thanks Q >reopening because you don't like a decision is a waste of everyone's time, and will result in temporary or permanent loss of JIRA access. Sounds good to me.
On 10/11/10 7:44 AM, "Kent Quirk (Q Linden)" <q...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > So we've modified the JIRA system again to allow residents to reopen issues in > VWR and STORM. > > But with power comes responsibility -- we aren't going to tolerate edit wars, > and we're not going to let JIRA be a place to vent your frustrations with us > or with each other. Please keep it polite. Reopening because of a mistake or a > misunderstanding is reasonable, especially when accompanied by a good > explanation. But reopening because you don't like a decision is a waste of > everyone's time, and will result in temporary or permanent loss of JIRA > access. > > I should note that on the Snowstorm team we're trying to aggressively prune > down JIRA to actionable issues. > > "FIX LAG" is not a useful JIRA to us, even if you don't think we've fixed it, > because it's too broad and unactionable. A summary JIRA with 3 separate > problems doesn't help us track it, especially when 2 of them have been fixed. > So we may close these, and we'll try to explain why. If the reason is that we > can't use the issue the way it's written, then please don't reopen it, write a > new and better one. > > Thanks for your help on this. > Q
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
