On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:32:18 -0800 (PST), Nicky Perian wrote: > What is the reason for the switch to boost shared libraries? > > The other platforms seem to perform without issue using boost static > libraries.
Apart from adding 20Mb of shared libraries (boost regexp) to the viewer package ?... There's strictly no good reason ! I vote for getting back to static libraries (the few regex functions that get statically linked only take a few kilobytes in the viewer binary, when the boost regex shared lib is enormous and 99% of it is usless to the viewer !) Henri. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
