https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2361
--- Comment #7 from Darren Tucker <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #6) > I dunno. It might not be possible. I don't think it is possible to do this, at least via any mechanism I'd be willing to support :-) (In reply to Damien Miller from comment #5) > Though maybe it is just better to allow each syscall based on its > own presence: I think that's a better idea. Although it's a bit ugly, IMO having a consistent pattern is easier to spot errors in and less ugly than having some inside ifdefs and some not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
