https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2361
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelen <[email protected]> --- Thanks for coming back to this. I was trying to create it in some way it will be less ugly, but I didn't find any better solution than having every SC_ALLOW covered with ifdef. I agree with dividing that select ifdefs according to presence. It doesn't hurt anything and would be much more clear. This construction discussed from comment #4 is coming from patch [1] by Marcin, which I had to rewrite little bit, but I left this one, because it was working. To make it less uggly, it would be possible to use more high-level library libseccomp [2], which solves such problems under the hood, but I'm not sure about support on different platforms. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=994437&action=diff [2] https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
