https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
--- Comment #3 from Darren Tucker <[email protected]> --- Comment on attachment 3344 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3344 sftp copy-data extension > [...] This avoids needing to >+download the data before uploading it across the network twice. Why uploading twice? [...] >+ { "copy-data", "copy-data", 0, process_extended_copy_data, 1 }, This is a protocol violation. The server is implementing secsh-filexfer-02 which does not specify copy-data. Vendor extensions such as this need an @[domainname] suffix. [...] >+ ret = read(read_fd, buf, len); ret should be ssize_t not int. That said I don't think we'd consider this without a client implementation since without that we can't test it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
