In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The binary that "OpenSSL" installs is still called "ssleay". Shouldn't it
> be renamed "openssl"?
Yes, it should. I'm already on the way preparing cleanups
in apps/.
> Also what do people think of the links that are made by default so that
> "s_client", "x509" etc can be run as separate programs rather than via
> "ssleay x509" etc? I've never liked or used them, but do others think that
> they are useful?
I think they mainly mess up the installation directory. It would be better to
force people to run the commands as "openssl <command>" as CVS does with "cvs
<command>". This way we've a consistent command line tool for which only one
openssl(1) manual page exists. And the interface is similar to "cvs" which is
a clean one.
So, I want to cleanup apps/ as following:
1. No generation of links
2. Renaming of ssleay to openssl.
Votes?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
