Paul Sutton wrote:
>
> The binary that "OpenSSL" installs is still called "ssleay". Shouldn't it
> be renamed "openssl"?
>
> Also what do people think of the links that are made by default so that
> "s_client", "x509" etc can be run as separate programs rather than via
> "ssleay x509" etc? I've never liked or used them, but do others think that
> they are useful?
I've never even noticed them, so I'm quite happy to lose them! However,
isn't that likely to break things for users? On that note, will we also
provide a link called "ssleay" for back compatibility?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
