> Not really. At some point I said "v8plus code is fine even for v9." Then
> I said "I'm wrong, v8plus is no good for v9, I'll look at v9." By latter
> I didn't mean that v8plus needs extra work.
Thanks for clarifying on that.
> solaris-usparc-gcc question:-) Shall you have one?
Sure. It will probably need a sparcv8plus-gcc.o file and a rule that
makes sure that as is used instead of gas.
Now it seems that committing the new sparcv8*.S files may have been
a bit premature. sparcv8.S is fine with gas, but as doesn't like it:
rzdspc2% cc -c sparcv8.S
"sparcv8.S", line 592: a: argument mismatch
"sparcv8.S", line 592: b: argument mismatch
"sparcv8.S", line 595: r: argument mismatch
"sparcv8.S", line 597: a: argument mismatch
"sparcv8.S", line 597: b: argument mismatch
"sparcv8.S", line 604: a: argument mismatch
and so on. Ditto with sparcv8plus.S. Any ideas?
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
