On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Ben already tried Doxygen some time ago. And there are various
> > similar approaches. Seems we've to evaluate most of them before
> > we should stick with one. Ben, what were your latest experiences
> > at this corner? I ask, because I've to admit that I've still
> > not found a tool for any of my projects which makes me really
> > happy. But doxygen was certainly still one of the better ones...
>
> I got no further: I can only take so much negativity before I give up.
> I'm still convinced that inline docco is the only kind with any hope,
> and doxygen did a reasonably good job. Other suggestions are welcome, of
> course, particularly if accompanied by experience.
I just had a play with Doxygen - it seems quite nice in that it doesn't
get in the way too much and the output it produces is very readable.
If I go ahead and start producing patches to add doxygen inline to
Openssl header files will they be included?
Regards,
Damien Miller
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.ilogic.com.au/~dmiller
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
