Damien Miller wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > > Ben already tried Doxygen some time ago. And there are various
> > > similar approaches. Seems we've to evaluate most of them before
> > > we should stick with one. Ben, what were your latest experiences
> > > at this corner? I ask, because I've to admit that I've still
> > > not found a tool for any of my projects which makes me really
> > > happy. But doxygen was certainly still one of the better ones...
> >
> > I got no further: I can only take so much negativity before I give up.
> > I'm still convinced that inline docco is the only kind with any hope,
> > and doxygen did a reasonably good job. Other suggestions are welcome, of
> > course, particularly if accompanied by experience.
>
> I just had a play with Doxygen - it seems quite nice in that it doesn't
> get in the way too much and the output it produces is very readable.
>
> If I go ahead and start producing patches to add doxygen inline to
> Openssl header files will they be included?
Actually they should mostly be in the source, surely? I'd be happy to
have them, but I can't unilaterally make that decision!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
