>There are two related uses PKCS#11 could be used for in OpenSSL. As a >standard for crypto operations and as a standard for a key and >certificate database: basically a sophisticated version of X509_LOOKUP. In my opinion, the first is desireable. The second, less so. But I probably don't understand the rationale for PKCS11 as a DB API. Can you explain it a bit more? r$ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Chris Zimman
- RE: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Salz, Rich
- Re: OpenSSL + Macintosh? Bill Doster
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Lutz Behnke
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Chris Zimman
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Lutz Behnke
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware suppo... Chris Zimman
- RE: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Chris Zimman
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Salz, Rich
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Peter Gutmann
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Lutz Behnke
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Per Nilsson
- Re: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Chris Zimman
- RE: Revised OpenSSL hardware support Ron Ramsay