On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 02:54:28AM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> automatically adds no-asm flag. I don't find it fair. Why do all those
> assembler implementations (they are *perfectly* compilable) get banned
> for *one*, *seldom* (well, *never* in SSL) referred to SHA-0
> implementation?
Well, if you're sure that there are no other problems, feel free to
restore the patch from md32_common.h revision 1.11, but it would
definitely be nice if this time we didn't get loads of mail from
Solaris x86 users who don't read INSTALL.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
