From: Gleb Esman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gesman> >Gleb Esman wrote:
gesman> > > When i saw so many global variables in use in SSL sources,
gesman> > > my hope for real multithreading of SSL is quickly depleting.
Having global variables per se is not an indication against MT
safety. It's all in the wrist... sorry, in the locking. (mind you,
I have not yet looked through the whole source to see if locking is
done in all cases where needed, but I was fairly confident it does)
Since I'm one of those who build applications with a high number of
threads, this problem interests me too. How about we talk about stuff
we've found (actually, it'll be more of what you found than what I
found at this point :-)), and see what we can do about it?
gesman> If there is a potential for the good will from the OpenSSL
gesman> development team, I could probably cut-down my sources to
gesman> demonstrate a problem.
*raises a flag marked "Good Will"*
Please do.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
