Richard, thanks.
I want to play more with locking callbacks
and I'll let everyone know how it goes. I hope it will help,
if not - I'll try to come up with small demo test code.
--
Gleb Esman
>From: Gleb Esman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>gesman> >Gleb Esman wrote:
>
>gesman> > > When i saw so many global variables in use in SSL sources,
>gesman> > > my hope for real multithreading of SSL is quickly depleting.
>
>Having global variables per se is not an indication against MT
>safety. It's all in the wrist... sorry, in the locking. (mind you,
>I have not yet looked through the whole source to see if locking is
>done in all cases where needed, but I was fairly confident it does)
>
>Since I'm one of those who build applications with a high number of
>threads, this problem interests me too. How about we talk about stuff
>we've found (actually, it'll be more of what you found than what I
>found at this point :-)), and see what we can do about it?
>
>gesman> If there is a potential for the good will from the OpenSSL
>gesman> development team, I could probably cut-down my sources to
>gesman> demonstrate a problem.
>
>*raises a flag marked "Good Will"*
>
>Please do.
>
>--
>Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
>Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
>See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
>______________________________________________________________________
>OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
>Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
