Hi ...
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> There's another variant that was proposed here, but hasn't yet been
> implemented, and it's that the section wouldn't just be a number.
> Instead, something like 1ssl, 3ssl, 5ssl and 7ssl would be used. The
> result is that you'd get a threads(3ssl), err(3ssl), passwd(1ssl),
> rc4(3ssl).
>
> How does that sonud to you?
That sounds familiar. I know this way from things like perl (eg. 3pm), a
thread lib (eg. 3thr) and some local stuff. To me, this way seems
favourable, also because this name space pollution (which occurs when no
categorization is done) should be prevented. This should not only be done
when cases occur which actually result in problems.
Alfe
____ ________
/___/ /___/___ http://www.cs.tu-berlin.de/~alfebtcd, Alfe @ TubMud
/___/___/___/___ Alexander Fetke, Bruno-Taut-Ring 5b, 12359 Berlin
/ /___/ /___ +49-30-60109906, [EMAIL PROTECTED], +49-30-44340358
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
