From: Dr Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drh> Neither sends a "reset message" since there's no such thing :-) Ah, so said document lies. Good to know. drh> However in my experience the Netscape handshake was broken on MSIE and drh> would only work if the start and end ciphers where RC4, that is only 40 drh> bit and 128 bit RC4 were enabled on the first connection. After the drh> first connection it recognised the server as being SGC and would use any drh> cipher suite. Interesting. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SGC, and do we really get it right?
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Tue, 27 Jun 2000 04:40:07 -0700
- SGC, and do we really get it right? Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SGC, and do we really get it right? Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: SGC, and do we really get it ri... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SGC, and do we really get it ri... Ben Laurie
- RE: SGC, and do we really get it right? Ramsay, Ron
- RE: SGC, and do we really get it ri... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
