Does the document actually lie? The reset refers to TCP/IP, a disconnection.
When I read the document I assumed that IE connected, got the SGC
certificate, disconnected and started again. Of course, if they no longer
disconnect then this makes it a little better?
Ron.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2000 21:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SGC, and do we really get it right?
From: Dr Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drh> Neither sends a "reset message" since there's no such thing :-)
Ah, so said document lies. Good to know.
drh> However in my experience the Netscape handshake was broken on MSIE and
drh> would only work if the start and end ciphers where RC4, that is only 40
drh> bit and 128 bit RC4 were enabled on the first connection. After the
drh> first connection it recognised the server as being SGC and would use
any
drh> cipher suite.
Interesting.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
