Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> All I can say is bleah! This file is a bitch to fill with new OIDs.
>
Can't say I've noticed it much myself. Then again I haven't added too
many new OIDs all in one go and I'm probably more tolerant at doing
menial tasks :-)
> So, I plan on hacking around a little, using objects.txt (which was
> apparently made exatly for this) and a objects.num as source to
> generate objects.h and obj_dat.h. objects.num is going to be updated
> in a similar to libeay.num and friends, so we keep the same sequence
> of NIDs, which I assume would easily become an issue.
>
Yes it would stuff binary compatibility if that was ever achieved.
> Comments? Screams of horror? Hoorays?
>
Just one comment. You break it, you get to fix it :-)
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
