From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ben> I thought there was still a flag to build with the old-style functions? I think that was finally taken away when someone invented the trick to get type-safe macros... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on Win32
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Thu, 14 Sep 2000 02:37:11 -0700
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on Win32 Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on W... Ben Laurie
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on W... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on W... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9... Dr S N Henson
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Ulf Moeller
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on W... rsalz
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Geoff Thorpe
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a on W... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: 0.9.6 incompatible with 0.9.5a ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
