> From: Francesco Gennai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Francesco.Gennai> My first problem is the change in the output of X509 command.
> Francesco.Gennai>
> Francesco.Gennai> I had the following call to the x509 command that worked fine
> Francesco.Gennai> with openssl-0.9.5a
> Francesco.Gennai>
> Francesco.Gennai> $ pipe openssl x509 -in 8EFAC7D4.0 -issuer -subject -hash -noout |
>(read
> Francesco.Gennai> sys$input var ; define/job lcMX120E0068D111 &var ; read sys$input
>var ;
> Francesco.Gennai> define/job lcMX120E0068D112 &var ; read sys$input var ; define/job
> Francesco.Gennai> lcMX120E0068D113 &var )
> What's the file format in the 0.9.5a case and in the 0.9.6-beta2 case?
> If you try the following (once for each version), what do you get?
> $ pipe openssl x509 -
> -in 8EFAC7D4.0 -issuer -subject -hash -noout > foo.out
> $ dir/full foo.out;
Here are the results:
Directory NIS_ROOT:[MSGVERIFY.CACERTS]
FOO-0-9-5A.OUT;1 File ID: (202465,7,0)
Size: 1/4 Owner: [MSGVERIFY]
Created: 19-SEP-2000 14:09:04.88
Revised: 19-SEP-2000 14:09:05.79 (1)
Expires: <None specified>
Backup: <No backup recorded>
Effective: <None specified>
Recording: <None specified>
File organization: Sequential
Shelved state: Online
Caching attribute: Writethrough
File attributes: Allocation: 4, Extend: 0, Global buffer count: 0, No version limit
Record format: VFC, 2 byte header, maximum 0 bytes, longest 148 bytes
Record attributes: Print file carriage control
RMS attributes: None
Journaling enabled: None
File protection: System:RWED, Owner:RWED, Group:RE, World:
Access Cntrl List: None
Client attributes: None
FOO-0-9-6.OUT;1 File ID: (202468,8,0)
Size: 1/4 Owner: [MSGVERIFY]
Created: 19-SEP-2000 14:07:27.40
Revised: 19-SEP-2000 14:07:28.03 (1)
Expires: <None specified>
Backup: <No backup recorded>
Effective: <None specified>
Recording: <None specified>
File organization: Sequential
Shelved state: Online
Caching attribute: Writethrough
File attributes: Allocation: 4, Extend: 0, Global buffer count: 0, No version limit
Record format: VFC, 2 byte header, maximum 0 bytes, longest 140 bytes
Record attributes: Print file carriage control
RMS attributes: None
Journaling enabled: None
File protection: System:RWED, Owner:RWED, Group:RE, World:
Access Cntrl List: None
Client attributes: None
Total of 2 files, 2/8 blocks.
The only difference that I see is the longest record size.
> In any case, it shouldn't matter, we haven't changed the way stdout is
> connected with since a long time back. However, we do print those
> lines in smaller pieces rather than one single line as in 0.9.5a, so
> that may be something that makes it different.
Probably this is the difference.
Surely I haven't changed anything: scripts, OpenVMS version, etc..
The *only* thing changed is OpenSSL.
Any help ?
Francesco
> The odd thing is that when I tried with 0.9.4 on VMS 7.2/VAX, foo.out
> was a Stream_LF, while doing the same thing with 0.9.6-beta2 on VMS
> 7.1/Alpha I got a VFC file. The VFC format is a bit strange for many
> programs and has some kind of built-in continuation coding that most
> programs just don't care about, so something that looks like one line
> when you print it to screen (TYPE does the right thing with almost
> anything), a program that tries to read it will get several distinct
> records...
> And still, we've handled stdout exactly the same way since before
> 0.9.4, so there should really be no difference. I suspect VMS or
> DECC$SHR are doing things we don't quite see...
> --
> Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
> Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
