From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> Well, I'd say that a proof-of-concept does not lie in the version
> number, but rather in the use of the package and it's stability and
> feasability (sp?). One can look at a number of products out there
> with major version numbers higher than 1 that are full of features but
> unstable and unreliable. My suggestion is that you try to get away
> from the version number discussion, that's a lost battle already...
[snip]
Thank you for your succinct and well-thought reply. I am in agreement
with you 100 percent! It is indeed simply a marketing-mentality issue
I'm attempting to address. My apologies to yourself and others for not
making myself clearer. I was hoping that a change in version would not
have had the huge impact on binary or backward compatibility as I now
know is the case. Perhaps I was simply looking for the easy answers
and simple solutions. I now realize that it will take a little more
persuasion and evangelism(sp) on my part! Again, thank you!
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
