From: Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 support
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 19:06:23 EST
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jaltman> > From: Vern Staats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jaltman> >
jaltman> > staatsvr> I haven't done anything with Heimdal. For what it's worth,
jaltman> > staatsvr> here are the MIT Kerberos calls I'm using...
jaltman> >
jaltman> > They're all present in Heimdal.
jaltman>
jaltman> But I do not think they behave the same. (although, this opinion is
jaltman> from some rather limited unsuccessful experience.)
That's weird. I've seen a lot of discussions and efforts being held
and made to get Heimdal as close to MIT KRB5 as possible without
looking at the MIT source (IIRC).
Damn, now you've made me curious!
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
