From: Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dkaufman> OK. Duplicate patch will be sent. I didn't think that the
dkaufman> export requirements applied to this patch, since it doesn't
dkaufman> change any of the encryption code, but better safe than
dkaufman> sorry. My apologies for the extra mail load to members of
dkaufman> the list.
>From what I've understood, the level at which things like this are
looked upon is what kind of *product* the patch or code applies to.
OpenSSL is a cryptographic product, therefore this kind of rule
applies.
After all, we gotta think about the poor lawyers. How would they know
what part of the code is cryptographic or not? :-)
(appologies to the lawyers out there who know how to read code)
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
