From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drh> X509_NAME_print_ex() is its replacement. There are various options to
drh> x509 that can change the format for example: "-nameopt oneline"
drh> "-nameopt multiline". At some point one of these should be made the
drh> default and the old format only selectable with "-nameopt compat".
I wonder, shouldn't there be something similar for
X509_get_{issuer|subject}_name()? They still give the X.400-form
string, which can be a bit confusing... Is there a reason why
"openssl x509 -subject ..." gives a different subject output than
"openssl x509 -text ...", appart from technical reasons?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
