From: Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> geoff> perhaps some consistency is in order, with optional backward geoff> compatibility macros there for the legacy/lethargic? I assume geoff> this would make the des_encrypt() problem go away? Yes, that wold be a solution. I would however avoid the macros because des_encrypt() has different arguments in the sstem crypt.h, and making a macro des_encrypt that leads to our definition would just be confusing... Perhaps macros for everything but des_encrypt for 0.9.6a and have them dropped in 0.9.7? -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris8INTEL
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:39:16 -0800
- Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th ... Geoff Thorpe
- Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: [BUGS] Various bugs with PG7.1 8th ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
