* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010325 23:55]:
> From: Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> geoff> perhaps some consistency is in order, with optional backward
> geoff> compatibility macros there for the legacy/lethargic? I assume
> geoff> this would make the des_encrypt() problem go away?
>
> Yes, that wold be a solution. I would however avoid the macros
> because des_encrypt() has different arguments in the sstem crypt.h,
> and making a macro des_encrypt that leads to our definition would just
> be confusing... Perhaps macros for everything but des_encrypt for
> 0.9.6a and have them dropped in 0.9.7?
I have no thoughts either way.
Thanks for at least considering a fix.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
