On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:17:45AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> From: Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> jclift> Just wondering if this problem has been solved? i.e. no conflicting
> jclift> des_encrypt() definition on Solaris, Unixware, etc?
>
> It hasn't been solved yet. My current thinking is that the OpenSSL
> variant should be renamed to something like des_encrypt1().
>
> This leads to the question if there's anyone out there using the
> OpenSSL variant of des_encrypt() directly. If so, I'd like to know,
> and I'm sure those who do use it directly would like to know about any
> changes :-).
I did not check the details, but at least cyrus-sasl uses the DES part
of OpenSSL, if found.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus Fax. +49 355 69-4153
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
