From: Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
drh> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
drh> >
[...]
drh> > Is there any reason for this? If not, I'll work on unifying this (not
drh> > immediately, however).
drh> >
drh>
drh> No reason at all.
Good to know...
drh> Now I come to think of it a lot of that stuff could be unified or
drh> called directly from the Configure script and do things in a more
drh> standard way such as writing the Windows makefile to "Makefile"
drh> at the top level like all the others. Then you could do something
drh> like:
drh>
drh> perl Configure VC-WIN32
drh> nmake
drh>
drh> and it would work or say...
drh>
drh> perl Configure VC-WIN32-debug
drh> nmake
Exactly what I was thinking. This would also leave room for building
different variants of the libraries as well (debug, non-debug,
threaded, non-threaded), which might solve the problems that many have
encountered...
drh> On the subject of Windows builds I had this idea of generating
drh> VC++ workspaces automagically by getting a perl script to get dev
drh> studio to create one of the beasts using OLE. This is left as an
drh> exercise to the reader :-)
Sounds like something Andrew Gray might want to do :-)
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
