X-Server-Uuid: 31375960-4340-11d5-912d-0050dabba66a
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 11:22:56 +0100 (MET)
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-URL: http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/
X-mailhacking1: I do not send mail using QP. I use 8bit instead.
However, some
X-mailhacking2: mail servers on the way might find pleasure in
converting my
X-Mailhacking3: messages to QP anyway. I will not be responsible for
that.
X-mailhacking4: See =?iso-8859-1?Q?http:
//www.lysator.liu.se/=E5ttabitars/?= to see the reasons.
X-Waved: dead chicken, GNU Emacs 20.6.1, Mew version 2.0 pre4
X-Mew: See http://www.mew.org/
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Manager: OpenSSL Majordomo [version 1.94.4]
X-List-Name: openssl-dev
X-WSS-ID: 10127A03309929-01-02
From: Oscar Jacobsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
oscar> Dr S N Henson wrote:
oscar> > On the subject of Windows builds I had this idea of generating VC++
oscar> > workspaces automagically by getting a perl script to get dev studio to
oscar> > create one of the beasts using OLE. This is left as an exercise to the
oscar> > reader :-)
oscar>
oscar> Just out of curiosity. Would such an exercise really be
oscar> "strictly necessary"?
No, I think not. That's probably also why Steve left it as an
exercise for the reader :-).
oscar> Is there really more to a VC workspace than simply the "meta
oscar> makefile" .dsw-file, which should be easy enough to
oscar> automatically generate from Configure?
The .dsp file?
oscar> And, em, dare one bring up the issue of having different names
oscar> for the target binaries depending on the type of build:
oscar> libeay32d.lib for a debug build, ssleay32s.lib for static crt
oscar> linkage etc? I really do feel this is a bit of an issue here,
oscar> since debug/release static/dynamic single-/multithreaded (and
oscar> probably etc.) builds will directly affect which CRT is linked
oscar> against. :-/
I briefly discussed that with Andrew Gray a week ago or so. Yeah, I
dare say that we (or at least I) intend to insert some kind of support
for different variants of the libraries. Stephen had an example of in
the mail you replied to.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
