From: Massimiliano Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> madwolf> I have not followed the discussion from the beginning, but have you madwolf> considered supporting BerkeleyDB ? We have, for our project, two madwolf> different modules one supporting SQL DBMS and the other using madwolf> BerkeleyDB as backend (one can choose what he likes best for his madwolf> own system). I suggest you to fist implement the simplest (for madwolf> the user point of view) that, to me, is the BerkeleyDB (or similar, madwolf> we use this because it is fast, reliable and os... ) and then madwolf> add support for SQL DBMS (more complex to administrate).
The subject is misleading. We concluded some time ago that the database type is irrelevant, it's just a matter of having an appropriate plugin. What's discussed here is basically what the OpenSSL framework (i.e., one layer or two above the actual database calls). should/would/could look like. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]