In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:27:56 -0400, "Andrew
W. Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hey Andrew
agray> Long time no talk,
Sure is :-)
agray> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you - on vacation.
That's ok.
agray> I guess architecturally, wouldn't it be better to keep functionality
agray> shared between different portions of the openssl commands separate from
agray> the individual application files. As opposed to do_subject(..), for
agray> example, residing in ca.c and being used additionally in req.c,
agray> shouldn't it be located within apps.c, where the rest of the utility and
agray> shared functions are kept?
I entirely agree, and you may have noticd that I've moved other
functions that seemed to be cut and pasted from one application to the
other, with exactly that in mind.
Thanks for explaining your thoughts.
agray> (Hope its cooler there in Sweden, than it is here in the states :-)
By very little, as far as I'm told...
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
