In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:54:21
+0100 (MET), "Jack Lloyd via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> Looks like the 1.1 TLS draft spec uses the same wording. Perhaps someone
rt> should contact the TLS WG and ask for a clarification on this issue? [I'll
rt> do it if nobody else is interested]
Please do.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
