No further reactions, so I'm moving this to 0.9.7a. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 4 16:14:25 2002]:
> I asked Eric Rescorla, and he agreed the section of the TLS RFC was > definitely unclear, but he wasn't totally sure which way it should go > as > far as stripping any leading 0s before using the shared secret to > generate > keys. It basically depends on what various implementations have > decided to > do. > > -J > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > > > > > I haven't heard any news about this. I also mailed ietf-tls asking > > about this, but had no response there either. That means there will > > most probably be no fix in 0.9.6h. 0.9.7 still has a week... > > > > I think I'll change the miestone for this fix. > > > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 19:05:29 2002]: > > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 14 > Nov > > > 2002 18:54:21 +0100 (MET), "Jack Lloyd via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > > > > rt> Looks like the 1.1 TLS draft spec uses the same wording. > Perhaps > > > someone > > > rt> should contact the TLS WG and ask for a clarification on this > > > issue? [I'll > > > rt> do it if nobody else is interested] > > > > > > Please do. > > > > > > > > -- Richard Levitte ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
