In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 01:02:16
+0100 (MET), "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> It seems as if you have answered your own earlier suggestion to me. I
rt> can confirm this. With OPSNSSL_NO_ASM defined true BETA 4 builds, tests
rt> and works with WASD OK for me too.
And I've just rewritten the bn_div_words routine. I don't know what I
smoked when I rewrote it last time, but this time, I've done some
pretty thorough tests. Also, the new routine makes sense
mathematically! It's nice when theory and practice work together...
rt> I was working my way back down the BETAs, 4 -> 3 -> 2 ..., looking for
rt> one that would work, when I read you ASM email. I went back to 4 and
rt> the above is the result. One of the issues with my tired old VAXstation
rt> 4000/60 is that each build and test run takes many hours.
Heh, I also run a 4000/60 for my tests, so I definitely know what
you're talking about. However, I'd love it if you could try replacing
your [.crypto/bn/asm]vms.mar with the attached file. And recompiling
partially should be easy:
$ @makevms crypto/bn <... the rest of your arguments ...>
$ @makevms ssl_task <... the rest of your arguments ...>
$ @makevms test <... the rest of your arguments ...>
$ @makevms apps <... the rest of your arguments ...>
That will take substancially less time.
And oh, before you recompile as shown above, don't forget to deassign
OPENSSL_NO_ASM :-).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
