In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun,  1 Dec 2002 11:48:27 
+0100 (MET), "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

rt> happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it!

Don't use any of them.  It still doesn't work for all numbers.  EDIV
is very hard to use for divisors that it perceives as negative, except
for 0x80000000.  The new implementation of bn_div_words works well for
all positive divisors, it seems.

I'm honestly cursing some CPU creators for not putting in an extended
DIV for unsigned numbers...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to