In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,  4 Dec 2002 18:08:25 
+0100 (MET), "[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

rt> I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary, 
rt> but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if 
rt> alliterative :-). IIRC there was some discussion a while back about 
rt> bundled implementations of pod2man or something like that? Could we 
rt> simply use a 5.8-compatible bundled implementation if the host system's 
rt> version is too old?

I've no problem with bundling a newer version.  After all, we have
something bundled in right now!

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to