In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:10:56 -0600, "Purvis, Rich (Sys Hou)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

Rich.Purvis>    I have looked through the email posts and seen the
Rich.Purvis> patch submitted by John Calcote and the discussion that
Rich.Purvis> followed, concerning the fact that it doesn't fully
Rich.Purvis> account as a full port for Win64. I did see that there
Rich.Purvis> was a Win64 branch created. We currently use OpenSSL
Rich.Purvis> under other OS's and I was wondering if there was an
Rich.Purvis> update or more information on a possible port to Win64?
Rich.Purvis> Any update or information on this would be appreciated,
Rich.Purvis> thanks for any help you can provide.

It's going, but slowly.  The goal is to have something ready for
0.9.8, so there's still time.  As it is right now, what's in that
branch isn't really functional (last time I dealt with it, it didn't
compile properly), but I'm working on it when I can.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to