> Rich.Purvis> I have looked through the email posts and seen the > Rich.Purvis> patch submitted by John Calcote and the discussion that > Rich.Purvis> followed, concerning the fact that it doesn't fully > Rich.Purvis> account as a full port for Win64. I did see that there > Rich.Purvis> was a Win64 branch created. We currently use OpenSSL > Rich.Purvis> under other OS's and I was wondering if there was an > Rich.Purvis> update or more information on a possible port to Win64? > Rich.Purvis> Any update or information on this would be appreciated, > Rich.Purvis> thanks for any help you can provide. > > It's going, but slowly. The goal is to have something ready for > 0.9.8, so there's still time. As it is right now, what's in that > branch isn't really functional (last time I dealt with it, it didn't > compile properly), but I'm working on it when I can.
Richard, why don't you ask for an account? HP have [or had?] an Itanium lab opened to independent developers. Wouldn't it speed things up? At least without a way to test, it can take literally eternity... A. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
