On May 20 11:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On May 20 01:43, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 00:15:40 +0200, Corinna > > Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > vinschen> In both cases I'll send a patch to fix that. It's just > > vinschen> rather late and especially the engine Makefile change needs > > vinschen> some testing, so give me a couple of days. > > > > If you get it to us before Monday, it will be there in the next > > planned beta (see http://www.openssl.org/news/state.html). > > Cool. I see what I can do. We're expecting a rainy weekend anyway :-)
Sorry for a possibly dumb question, but I don't quite understand the engines concept. Is there a good reason that the engine shared libs are created w/o version information? The problem is that Makefile.shared is called from engines/Makefile without LIBVERSION being set to a sensible value, as it's done in the top level Makefile: LIBVERSION=${SHLIB_MAJOR}.${SHLIB_MINOR} Even worse, the engines Makefile doesn't even have the version information set anywhere, so it's not clear to me how I can generate the engines with version info. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat, Inc. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]