On May 20 11:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 20 01:43, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 20 May 2005 00:15:40 +0200, Corinna
> > Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > vinschen> In both cases I'll send a patch to fix that. It's just
> > vinschen> rather late and especially the engine Makefile change needs
> > vinschen> some testing, so give me a couple of days.
> >
> > If you get it to us before Monday, it will be there in the next
> > planned beta (see http://www.openssl.org/news/state.html).
>
> Cool. I see what I can do. We're expecting a rainy weekend anyway :-)
Sorry for a possibly dumb question, but I don't quite understand the
engines concept. Is there a good reason that the engine shared libs
are created w/o version information?
The problem is that Makefile.shared is called from engines/Makefile
without LIBVERSION being set to a sensible value, as it's done in
the top level Makefile:
LIBVERSION=${SHLIB_MAJOR}.${SHLIB_MINOR}
Even worse, the engines Makefile doesn't even have the version information
set anywhere, so it's not clear to me how I can generate the engines with
version info.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat, Inc.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [email protected]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
