1. I don't expect any thing developed specilay for me, I was just wondering if there is any one out there that knew about a function that already exists and does it.
2. I am not designing a system to break in 10 years, I am thinking of better performance for the time until we need to find a better solution. BTW why will I run into trouble at 2015 it should be good up to 2037? Am I missing some thing? Thanks, Joe On 1/31/06, David Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I will not get certificates today for after 2045 because the > > certificates that I am checking are certificates that already past a > > validation check and have been inserted into my cache system, therefor > > it is a certificate signed by our own system which does not sign for > > more then 25 year. most are 1 year. > > > > Thanks Joe > > You may have a special case, but you can't expect the library to be > designed for your special case. You'll run into trouble after 2015 anyway -- > any special reason you're designing things to break in 10 years? > > DS > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
